When locations are nearly identical in design and operation, their energy costs should also be similar. Portfolio benchmarking highlights where costs deviate, allowing operators to identify inefficiencies and purchasing opportunities.
Supporting franchise groups, regional chains, and independent multi-unit restaurant operators nationwide.
Energy Portfolio Management Partner
National Restaurant Association
When locations are nearly identical in design and operation, their energy costs should also be similar. Portfolio benchmarking highlights where costs deviate, allowing operators to identify inefficiencies and energy purchasing opportunities.
Energy Portfolio Management Partner

Supporting franchise groups, national chains, and independent multi-unit restaurant operators nationwide.
(A complimentary service for National Restaurant Association Multi-Location Operators)




















When multi-location restaurant portfolios are benchmarked side-by-side, similar locations under the same ownership often pay materially different energy rates.
If you’re seeing this page, you likely scanned the QR code from the letter JD sent earlier.
The reason for that letter is simple.
When Greencrown benchmarks multi-location restaurant portfolios, we often find similar restaurants under the same ownership paying materially different energy rates.
Same company.
Same concept.
Similar footprint.
Different energy pricing.
These differences rarely appear in day-to-day operations.
They move quietly through operating expenses and directly impact EBITDA.
For many restaurant groups operating long hours with heavy kitchen loads, refrigeration, HVAC, and ventilation systems, energy is one of the largest controllable expenses across the portfolio.
Even small pricing differences between locations can compound quickly.
The issue is rarely intentional.
In most multi-location restaurant portfolios it occurs because:
Energy contracts renew at different times across locations and in multiple utilities
Procurement decisions happen independently location-to-location
Market exposure goes unmonitored at the portfolio level
Over time, those small differences compound across locations.
Across portfolios of 20+ locations, we routinely discover annual variances resulting in a savings opportunity between $180,000 and $450,000.
For restaurant operators managing tight margins and rising labor and food costs, correcting that variance can improve EBITDA without raising menu prices or reducing staff.
At typical restaurant portfolio valuation has a multiple of 6x to 8x EBITDA, which represents a potential enterprise value improvement between $1.1M and $3.6M.
Most operators never see it because locations are evaluated individually rather than as a portfolio.
Greencrown is the official Energy Partner for the National Restaurant Association and supports multi-location restaurant operators nationwide in evaluating portfolio-level energy exposure.
JD will execute a short portfolio benchmark comparing energy pricing across your locations.
The goal is simple;
Confirm whether your locations are financially aligned or determine if pricing variance exists across your portfolio.
This review does not require changing suppliers or brokers.
It simply verifies whether your portfolio is structured correctly so each location operates under the same financial assumptions.
Book Your 20-Minute Portfolio Benchmark with JD
There is no cost and no obligation.
If everything is already aligned across your portfolio, you’ll confirm it.
If not, you’ll know exactly where the variance exists.
Regards,

Sal Ritorto
Principal and President
Greencrown Energy
Copyright © 2026 Greencrown. All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy